Peter Straughan Conclave Oscar

Trend Breaks

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Jan 24, 2025

30 visitor like this post

Share

Peter Straughan's Conclave: An Oscar-Worthy Screenplay? A Deep Dive

Hey everyone, so you wanna talk about Peter Straughan and his screenplay for Conclave? Let's dive in. I've been a film buff for ages, and this is one that's stuck with me, for better or worse. I'll tell you why.

First off, let's be clear: I'm not a film critic, just a huge movie fan. I don't have any fancy degrees or anything like that. I just love a good story, ya know? That being said, this script... it was something else.

<h3>The Pope's Dead: What a Mess</h3>

I remember seeing Conclave for the first time. I was totally hooked from the opening scene; that immediate tension, those power plays starting even before the old Pope kicked the bucket! Straughan really nailed the atmosphere—the claustrophobia, the intrigue. It's so different than a typical Hollywood thriller. It's all about the subtle shifts in power, the quiet negotiations, the backstabbing disguised as holy devotion. It’s like a really intense game of chess, but with cardinals instead of chess pieces!

But here's the thing: while it totally sucked me in, the pacing in some parts felt a little… uneven. There are moments where the story just drags. I mean, seriously, some of those theological discussions could have been condensed! It felt a little slow at times, especially for a movie that also has a bunch of action sequences.

One thing I loved was how Straughan portrayed the characters. He made them feel real, even though they are, ya know, cardinals. Each one had distinct motivations, flaws, and ambitions. You could actually understand why they did what they did—even if you didn't agree with it. It's a masterclass in character development, for sure. This is important because good character development leads to an overall better narrative.

<h3>The Politics of the Vatican: A Screenwriting Challenge</h3>

This is where it gets interesting. The politics of the Vatican are complex, a whole other world. Straughan managed to simplify things for the screen without losing the essence of the power struggles. It wasn’t always perfect, I'll admit. Sometimes, I felt lost in the intricacies of the election process itself. There were several points where I had to rewind and make sure I understood who was doing what. It’s a pretty niche subject matter, and honestly, I think even someone knowledgeable about the subject matter could struggle with some of the nuances.

Honestly, I think that's part of what makes the screenplay so compelling—the challenge of adapting such a specific and complex topic to the screen. It was ambitious, and I really appreciate the effort put into research and translating the intricacies into a narrative that works for a wider audience.

<h3>Why Didn't It Win an Oscar? (Speculation!)</h3>

Now, about that Oscar… I honestly think there are several reasons why Conclave didn't scoop the big prize. Maybe it wasn't flashy enough? Perhaps the subject matter wasn't broad enough to appeal to the entire Academy? Or maybe it simply got overshadowed by other, more commercially successful films that year? There’s just so much that goes into winning an Oscar.

In conclusion, Conclave is a fascinating study in political intrigue, and while I have some issues with the pacing, the characters were incredibly compelling, and the overall mystery definitely kept me on the edge of my seat. Straughan showed a talent for weaving complexity into a film, and the script itself is worth studying for aspiring screenwriters. It proves that a movie doesn't need explosions and car chases to be gripping. Sometimes, the most explosive moments happen in quiet rooms.

Keywords: Peter Straughan, Conclave, Oscar, Screenplay, Film Analysis, Movie Review, Vatican, Political Intrigue, Cardinal, Power Struggle, Screenwriting, Character Development, Film Pacing, Adaptation.